Theoretical Framework

2.1 The ICF model in employment contexts

The theoretical foundation of the Placement Feasibility Interview is grounded in the ICF framework, which introduces a shift from a diagnostic perspective to a functional one.

Rather than focusing on clinical categories or deficits, the methodology seeks to understand how individuals function within specific environments. This approach allows for a more accurate and meaningful analysis of employability, as it takes into account the dynamic interaction between personal capacities and environmental demands.

In employment contexts, this perspective is particularly relevant. A person’s ability to perform a task is not fixed, but varies depending on contextual conditions such as noise levels, task structure, communication style, and social expectations. Consequently, the interview must continuously interpret responses in relation to these factors, rather than treating them as isolated characteristics.

2.2 Neurodiversity-Affirming & Rights-Based Practice

The JobAut methodology adopts a neurodiversity-affirming and rights-based perspective, recognising autistic individuals as having distinct ways of functioning rather than deficits to be corrected.

This perspective requires the job coach to engage with the coachee in a respectful and empowering manner, ensuring that the process supports autonomy and avoids reinforcing dependency or stigma.

In practical terms, this means that differences are framed as variations, strengths are highlighted, and the coachee is actively involved in the process. The interview becomes not only a tool for data collection, but also a space in which self-awareness and agency begin to develop.

2.3 Objectives of the Placement Feasibility Interview

The primary objective of the interview is to gather comprehensive information that allows for an informed evaluation of job placement feasibility.

This includes understanding the individual’s motivations, preferences, functional abilities, environmental sensitivities, and support needs. At the same time, the process initiates a reflective pathway for the coachee, encouraging them to recognise patterns in their experiences and to articulate their needs more clearly.

The interview therefore serves both an analytical and an empowering function, bridging assessment and personal development.